Ingest
CNAPP findings, Jira tickets, DAST results, CVE/KEV feeds and bounty reports normalize into one deduped threat graph.
Every vulnerability — from your CNAPP, your Jira board, your DAST run, the CVE feed — arrives, gets investigated against your edge's own telemetry, and comes back as a layered edge rule proven against the vulnerability's every variant — in your vendor's dialect.
We don't pretend the edge fixes everything. Auth logic, vulnerable dependencies, app-layer SSRF get routed to the owner with the attack path attached. That's what makes a "yes" verdict worth acting on.
CNAPP findings, Jira tickets, DAST results, CVE/KEV feeds and bounty reports normalize into one deduped threat graph.
RCA across reachability, blast radius, exposure, exploitability and attack path — using your edge's own read-only logs as ground truth. False positives fall out of it.
Edge-defensible or not. Yes goes forward; no gets routed to the code or config owner. Uncertain goes to a human.
The vulnerability's whole variant tree — every encoding, position and mutation — replayed against your live rules alongside benign traffic, for a two-sided confidence score.
A layered ruleset compiled to your vendor's dialect — exported to apply, or opened as a Terraform PR against your IaC repo. You merge.
A rule that mitigates 100% of attacks and trips 15% of legitimate traffic scores low. That's the number that actually unlocks moving from observe to enforce.
One pattern is bypassed by the next variant. Edgenta proposes an ordered, layered ruleset — broad heuristic, specific signatures, anomaly scoring — that survives mutation.
Agentless: API keys and log export. No inline proxy, no write access to your edge, no auto-apply. Adoption risk stays near zero.
Mitigating the proof-of-concept means nothing — the next request encodes it differently. Edgenta maps the vulnerability's full attack surface into a variant tree, then proves the ruleset holds against every branch, not just the one in the advisory.
"Mitigated" is reported per variant branch. If one branch stays open, the finding does not close — it comes back as a gap with the exact payload that got through, so the next ruleset iteration has something concrete to beat.
Rules change, zones change, new bypass techniques get published. The variant set for a threat is versioned and replayed, so coverage you proved last quarter is coverage you still have.
The delay was never the rule-writing. It was waiting for someone to decide whether the finding was real, whether the edge already covered it, and whether the fix would break checkout. Edgenta answers all three before a human opens the ticket.
A canonical rule IR sits in the middle, so no single vendor is load-bearing — a mixed estate is one pane, not three.
CNAPPs got very good at telling you that you're exposed to CVE-X. They stop there. Nobody answers the next question: is your edge actually mitigating CVE-X right now?
So teams write the rule by hand, put it in log mode because they're scared of breaking legitimate traffic, and leave it there for months. The control exists but nobody trusts it. Meanwhile the exposure report says "mitigated."
Two things changed. Vendor rule engines went open — wirefilter, Coraza, CRS — so we can replay your real rules against real traffic offline, with zero production risk. And agents got good enough to map a vulnerability's full attack surface and design a layered defense against it, then prove it. That combination didn't exist eighteen months ago. It does now, and it makes minutes possible.
Connect one source and one edge zone, read-only. We'll run your open findings through the loop and show you which ones your edge already handles — and which ones it doesn't.